GE Vivid E95 vs PHILIPS iU22

They differ on 6 lines of the comparison table. Among the differences: Monitor size — 22″ on the GE Vivid E95, 20″ on the PHILIPS iU22; 4D imaging — Optional on the GE Vivid E95, Yes on the PHILIPS iU22; Tissue harmonic imaging — Yes on the GE Vivid E95, Optional on the PHILIPS iU22; Anatomical M-mode — Yes on the GE Vivid E95, Optional on the PHILIPS iU22; DICOM — Optional on the GE Vivid E95, Yes on the PHILIPS iU22. The full table on this page lists every line where the two disagree, as stated in current listings.

In used condition the PHILIPS iU22 is the cheaper of the two. Current offers put the GE Vivid E95 at $19,700–$58,600 in used condition and the PHILIPS iU22 at $2,650–$11,900 in used condition. These are ranges of current offers and move with configuration and age, so treat them as a starting point, not a price tag.

Both report cardiology, vascular work and general imaging, so for that work either one covers the task. The GE Vivid E95 additionally reports Tissue harmonic imaging and Anatomical M-mode and the PHILIPS iU22 additionally reports 4D imaging and DICOM. We do not rank the two: beyond the specifications, the choice comes down to the configuration each supplier actually offers, the transducers included and the price you are quoted.